Confused about what is embedded and synthetic phonics? Fear not, in this post we will breakdown what is embedded phonics vs synthetic phonics.
Embedded Phonics vs Synthetic Phonics
What is Embedded Phonics?
Embedded phonics is an approach to teaching phonics that integrates phonics instruction with other reading skills, such as comprehension and vocabulary development. This approach is often used in whole language programs where phonics is not the primary focus. In embedded phonics instruction, your child learns phonics principles as he or she encounters them in the reading material. For example, if a child comes across the word “can” in a story, the teacher may take the opportunity to teach your child that the “c” makes the /k/ sound.
One of the main benefits of embedded phonics is that it helps children see the practical application of phonics rules in real reading situations. It also allows them to focus on meaning and fluency while still learning phonics skills.
However, some may argue that embedded phonics may not provide enough systematic instruction for struggling readers who need more explicit phonics instruction. Additionally, some may struggle to connect phonics rules to their reading experiences when there are no clear instructions.
In my opinion, embedded phonics is more suitable for auditory and visual learners who benefit from learning in context. It also appeals to kinesthetic learners who prefer hands-on, real-world learning experiences. The child is cornered to connect phonics rules to his or her reading experiences thereby making meaningful associations. This, in turn, will foster a deeper understanding of phonics principles through practical application in the reading process.
What then is Synthetic Phonics?
On the other hand, synthetic phonics is a systematic and explicit approach to teaching phonics that involves teaching kids the individual sound-letter combinations (graphemes) and then blending these sounds together to form words. This method is often used in phonics-based programs where phonics is the primary focus. In synthetic phonics instruction, children learn phonics rules in a progressive and structured manner. For example, students may learn the sounds of individual letters and then practice blending those sounds to read words like “bat” or “doll.”
One of the main benefits of synthetic phonics is that it provides a clear and consistent framework for teaching phonics skills. This approach has been shown to be effective in helping students develop strong decoding skills and improve reading fluency at a young age. It is also ideal for visual learners who excel in recognizing and manipulating letter-sound relationships correspondences. Auditory learners who thrive on repetition and systematic instruction of phonics can benefit from such an approach. Because of the clear and consistent framework for phonics instruction, it makes it easier for some kids to grasp and apply phonics rules.
However, some would argue that synthetic phonics instruction may be too rigid and end up focusing on rote memorization of phonics rules, without allowing for the natural discovery of phonics principles in real reading situations.
Which Phonics Approach Is Better for Your Child?
As a parent, you may be wondering which approach – embedded phonics or synthetic phonics – is better for your child. The answer to this question may depend on your child’s individual learning style, preferences, and needs.
If your child thrives on structured and systematic instruction, then synthetic phonics may be the best fit. This approach provides a clear and consistent framework for learning phonics skills, which can be especially helpful for struggling readers who need explicit instruction. Personally I find showing very young children how to mouth the sounds of single letters and then steadily blending them – c-v-c – such as an example, thus showing how the word ‘cut’ is pronounced, is rather easily taught and can be approached in fun and creative ways.
On the other hand, if your child learns best through contextual and real-world experiences, embedded phonics may be more effective. This approach allows students to see the practical application of phonics rules in real reading situations, which can help foster a deeper understanding of phonics principles.
Ultimately, the approach of preference to teaching phonics will depend on your child’s individual needs and greater liking. Do you prefer the more holistic and flexible style where learning to read emphasises on the understanding of words and sentences, over just decoding words and
phrases?
Then pick embedded phonics. Or do you like the more systematic format whereby synthetic phonics can equip your child with the skills of phonological awareness and the ability to decode unfamiliar words independently, later enhancing his reading fluency and comprehension?
Some children may benefit from a combination of both embedded and synthetic phonics instruction, while others may thrive with one approach over the other.
Conclusion
As a parent, you can work with your child’s school teacher or the enrichment center’s trainer to determine the better approach to phonics instruction based on your child’s strengths, weaknesses, and learning style. By providing support and encouragement, you can help your child develop strong phonics skills and become a confident reader.
More resource